The infamous double standard has been a serious topic of discussion since the 1960s. It was first defined by researcher, Ira Reiss, as the idea of prohibiting sexual intercourse for women but allowing it for men. Women were only permitted to engage in sexual relations once they were in a committed relationship. However, men were allowed to experience as many sexual partners as they wanted.
When brought to present day, men are still considered “players”, “macks”, or “pimpin” when they are fruitfully spreading their loin goodness. Women on the other hand or perceived as “whores”, “sluts”, or “skanks” for having too many miles on the merchandise and are often the less desirable of settling men.
I’ve never heard a guy say he wanted to marry a virgin, but I’ve also never heard a woman say she wanted a very experienced man.
Loading ...
Who gives a fuck? Clean is clean and monogamous is monogamous. If you can’t, don’t or won’t have those two things. Get your ass the fuck on.
I’m a firm believer in “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”.
Don’t play if you don’t want to get played.
My motto for 2010: “Cut or be cut.” Don’t know what it means exactly but it sounds good.
Wrong again sir. Clean with 40 partners under your belt is a lot different than clean with 4 partners under your belt. If you don’t believe me I’ll see you in divorce court.
That’s where the monogamous part comes in.
There is a double standard. If you don’t believe me, fellas, compare number of partners with your SO. Look in the mirror at your face if her total is larger than yours.
LOL, this has to do with traditional marriage more than anything. Men could have as many women as they wanted. However, if he pays a bride price for used goods he’s going to be upset because he thought it was brand new.
Who wants a used car when you can get something thats just like new? Thats worse than getting with a woman who doesn’t give you any sons. Just useless.
But, in this instance the man would be “used” goods as well so what makes him any less “useless”. A woman could very easily say the same thing.
As for the woman that doesn’t give you any sons being useless. It is the male that determines the sex of the child so he would be two for two on the useless front.